Deming Model Essay

Cheap Custom Writing Service

A method  for ensuring  that  quality is incorporated into every stage of every task carried out by an organization  is known as the Deming Model or Deming Cycle. The model is named for Dr. William Edwards Deming (1900–93), who is widely credited with exerting a lasting influence on the study of quality. Deming’s model  is a feedback loop with four parts: (1) Plan: identify customer  needs and expectations,  set strategic  objectives;  (2) Do: implement  and operate  processes; (3) Check: collect business results, monitor and measure the processes, review and analyze; and (4) Act: continually improve process performance.

Deming argued that managers must continuously improve their production and service processes. He believed that  improvement was not just a one-time effort, but  that  managers  are obligated  to continuously search for and implement ways to reduce waste and  improve  quality.  Continuous   quality  improvement  is driven by two imperatives: (1) To maintain and increase sales income, companies must continually evolve new product  features and new processes to produce these features; and (2) to keep costs competitive, companies must continually reduce the level of product  and process deficiencies. Continuous improvement is embodied in a structured approach— the Plan, Do, Check, and Act model (PDCA)—that emphasizes  organizational  commitment to the  systematic, continual improvement of the capability, reliability, and efficiency of business processes.

Deming was one of the leading figures in the quality movement  of the 1950s to 1970s. His early work involved the development  of statistical  quality control (SQC) on production lines. While his work was largely ignored  in  his  home  country,  in  the  early 1950s in postwar reconstruction Japan, Deming, and another quality control expert, Joseph Juran, emerged as major influences on the Japanese drive for quality, most notably in the Toyota Production  System. In the late 1970s, as American firms found themselves under increasingly fierce competition  from Japanese firms producing low-cost, high-quality goods, Deming and Juran were rediscovered  by their  home  country  as quality  issues became  integrated  into  management thinking and practice. Today, Deming-influenced practices can be seen in firms of every size all around the world, his name forever associated with the concept of total quality management  (TQM).

While pursuing his Ph.D. in mathematical  physics at Yale University, Deming spent his summers  working at the Hawthorne-based telephone assembly plant of Western  Electric, a subsidiary of AT&T. During Deming’s time at Hawthorne  the company was part of a research project, led by two Harvard University investigators,  Elton  Mayo and  Fritz  Roethlisberger, focusing on the effects of environmental conditions on productivity. Deming’s Hawthorne  experience taught him  about  factory  management   and  the  mistakes being made in terms of both machine and human efficiency. While at Hawthorne, Deming came across the pioneering  work in statistical  quality control  being undertaken by Walter  Shewhart,  then  employed  in doing research for AT&T. Shewhart developed statistical sampling methods that could identify defects or variations in quality during  the production process. In Shewhart’s view, the root causes of defects need to be detected as soon as possible, and then those causes should be eliminated.

During the 1980s Deming was for a time the best-known management  guru in the world. To Deming, quality was more  than  just a set of techniques  for quality control  and  standardization. Quality had  to become a mindset, embraced by the entire company. His book Out  of the Crisis (1986) describes  how a quality system can be introduced,  while his last work, The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education (1993), urges the importance  of quality thinking for national competitiveness and prosperity.

Deming  believed that  the  primary  responsibility for quality lay with management; he was opposed to the misconception that poor quality was due solely to low skills and/or poor performance by workers. From Shewhart, Deming adopted the PDCA cycle in which actions and events are constantly monitored and defects or problems  noticed  quickly and eradicated. This became famous in Japan as the Deming cycle or Deming model.

Revisionists think that Japan (as well as Shewhart) had  a  profound   influence  on  Deming’s  thinking, rather  than  the  reverse.  Statistical  quality  control was already known  in Japan and  several organizations were actively involved in its development  and implementation. Japanese ideas on total quality management  influenced  Deming’s later  thinking.  Other revisionists credit Joseph Juran with even greater influence in Japan than  Deming. Working  independently, Juran argued that to achieve quality, management needs to move away from statistical targets and toward a culture of continuous  improvement,  backed up by training and motivation. Another quality guru, Philip Crosby, an engineer with ITT for many years, developed his own 14 points, which likewise include training,  motivation,  and  the  commitment by top management  to improving quality, focusing on zero defects to avoid repairs, replacement  of defective products, and lost customers.

Bibliography:   

  1. John Beckford, Quality (Routledge, 2002);
  2. Thomas J. Douglas and Lawrence D Fredendall, “Evaluating the Deming  Management  Model of Total  Quality in Services,”  Decision Sciences (v.35/3,  2004);
  3. Caroline Fisher, Jesse Barfield, Jing Li, and Rajiv Mehta, “Retesting a Model of the Deming Management  Method,” Total Quality  Management  and  Business Excellence (v.16/3, 2005);
  4. Michael Lowenstein,  The Customer  Loyalty Pyramid (Quorum  Books, 1997);
  5. David E. Meen and Mark Keough, “Creating the Learning Organization,” McKinsey Quarterly (1992);
  6. Michael A. Milgate, Transforming Corporate Performance: Measuring and Managing the Drivers of Business Success (Praeger, 2004);
  7. Judy D. Olian et al., “Designing Management  Training  and Development  for Competitive Advantage: Lessons from the Best,” Human Resource Planning (v.21, 1998);
  8. Morgen Witzel, Fifty Key Figures in Management (Routledge, 2003);
  9. John C. Wood and Michael C. Wood, W. Edwards Deming: Critical Evaluations in Business and Management (Routledge, 2005).

This example Deming Model Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

See also:

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER


Always on-time

Plagiarism-Free

100% Confidentiality

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH 24START DISCOUNT CODE