Ethnocentric Human Resource Policy Essay

Cheap Custom Writing Service

The term  ethnocentric is derived from the Hellenic (Greek)  word  εθνοκεντρισμός,  a  composite   word that consists of the term έθνος, which means nation, and the term κέντρο, which means center. The meaning of the term is identical in both the Hellenic and the English language, and signifies that policies and systems in the countries  in which the multinational corporation operates (the host countries) revolve around the policies and systems of the country from which the multinational organization originates (the home country).

In ethnocentric orientation,  human  resource  systems in the host countries  mirror  those that are utilized in the home  country.  The idea is that  if these systems have worked well in the home country, they should work well everywhere, with little or no adaptation to the local conditions and culture. Hence, the ethnocentric human resource approach pays minimal attention to local factors. However, evidence suggests that  direct  transferability  of  human  resource  systems across national boundaries  without  taking into account cultural factors is risky.

A trademark  characteristic  of the ethnocentric human   resource   approach   is  the  employment   of home  country  nationals  to fill key positions  in the host country.  Reasons for adopting  an ethnocentric approach in the staffing of operations include:

  • Starting up operations in host countries. This is a critical stage, and there is a need to place individuals in host countries  who are fully aware of the needs of the multinational and any specifications, as these have been set by the headquarters. Normally individuals who are most familiar with the goals and demands of the multinational as these have been set by the headquarters are home-country nationals who have been with the corporation for some time.
  • Technical expertise.  Many times multinational corporations need to transfer scientific and technological   knowledge,  professional   expertise, and managerial skills into new operations. In many cases the knowledge and skills do not exist  in  the  local  workforce,  especially if the product  is highly specialized and  utilizes cutting-edge technology. Therefore, it is necessary to deploy home-country nationals in host-country operations.
  • Maintenance of  financial  control   and  facilitation  of coordination.  A major  need  for the headquarters is effective and efficient communication  as well as trust  with key employees in host countries.  It is natural  to consider that this is more feasible when key positions in host-country operations  are filled with home country nationals.
  • Provision of international experience for promising managers and professionals. An assignment abroad normally requires  ability to work independently and to show initiative in an unfamiliar environment.  This serves as a test and as an opportunity for development for home-country managers  and  professionals  who are groomed for senior positions.
  • Need to maintain the foreign image of the multinational corporation. Sometimes the headquarters consider that it is in the best interests of the corporation that operations  in particular  countries are associated with the home country. This, for  example,  can  be  the  case  when  products from a particular  home country  in a particular market have a very good reputation;  or when a particular home country is viewed positively by host-country nationals.
  • The multiracial or multireligious  population  of the host country. In some cases the host country has a population that belongs to two or more races or religions that have a history of rivalry. In such cases it may be risky for the multinational corporation to appoint a local national, because nationals from the other races or religions may perceive it as bias against them.

Ethnocentrism in human resource policy has been the norm in the past, but it is a phenomenon that is dissipating. There are a number  of reasons for this, including  the  realization  of the  importance  of cultural factors in the appropriate  functioning of human resource  systems, the  improving  level of education around the globe that has increased the availability of qualified managerial and professional workers in host countries, and the high cost of expatriates.

Bibliography:   

  1. David G. Collings, Hugh Scullion, and Michael J. Morley, “Changing Patterns of Global Staffing in the Multinational  Enterprise: Challenges to the Conventional Expatriate Assignment and Emerging Alternatives,” Journal of World Business (v.42/2, 2007);
  2. Terence Jackson, “The Management of People Across Cultures: Valuing People Differently,” Human  Resource Management  (v.41/4, 2002);
  3. Jo Rhodes, Paul Walsh, and Peter Lok, “Convergence and Divergence Issues in Strategic Management—Indonesia’s Experience With the Balanced Scorecard in HR Management,” The International Journal of Human  Resource Management   (v.19/6,  2008);
  4. Michael Stevens  et  al., “HR Factors Affecting Repatriate Job Satisfaction and Job Attachment for  Japanese Managers,” International  Journal  of Human  Resource Management  (v.17, 2006);
  5. Miao Zhang and Christine Edwards, “Diffusing ‘Best Practice’ in Chinese Multinationals: the  Motivation,  Facilitation  and Limitations,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management (v.18/12, 2007).

This example Ethnocentric Human Resource Policy Essay  is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

See also:

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER


Always on-time

Plagiarism-Free

100% Confidentiality

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH 24START DISCOUNT CODE