Labor Standards Essay

Cheap Custom Writing Service

Labor standards are multidimensional and vary from country  to  country  depending  on  national  institutions,  economic  interests,  income  level, stages  of development,   openness   to   trade,   and   economic, social,  political,  and  cultural   conditions.   International labor standards  refer to those labor principles, norms,  conventions,  and  recommendations that  do not depend  on national  circumstances,  and that  are intended  to be universally applied. These standards cover issues in the areas of employment, work, social security, human rights, and social policy.

International labor  standards  are  generally  considered   institutional  mechanisms   for  raising   the quality of economic growth in developed and developing countries. For that reason, the issue of international labor standards  has been given a high profile in regional  and  multilateral  policy discussions  and negotiations. In 1996 the Organisation  for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published a policy brief that defined and limited a set of core labor standards: (1) prohibition of forced labor; (2) freedom of association; (3) the right to organize and bargain collectively; (4) elimination  of child labor  exploitation; and  (5) nondiscrimination in employment.  In 1998 the  International Labour  Organization  (ILO) adopted  the Declaration  of Universal Principles and Rights at Work, which consists of (1) freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; (2) the elimination  of all forms of forced or compulsory labor; (3) the effective abolition of child labor; and (4) the elimination  of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation. International  frameworks,  such  as the  global corporate citizenship  initiative Global Compact  have adopted the four principles of the ILO declaration  adopted in 1998. The rationale  behind  the adoption  of the ILO international labor standards  by the Global Compact initiative is that responsible practices by the business community,  such as assuming at least a minimum  of universal norms in working conditions,  are essential for promoting social justice, peace, and prosperity.

Since creation of the ILO in 1919 more than 190 Recommendations and over 180 Conventions  have been adopted  by the International Labour Conference. The ILO classifies international labor standards into 22 subjects: (1) freedom of association, collective bargaining, and industrial  relations; (2) forced labor; (3) elimination of child labor and protection of children and young persons; (4) equality of opportunity and treatment; (5) tripartite   consultation;  (6) labor  administration  and inspection;  (7)  employment   policy  and  promotion; (8) vocational guidance and training; (9) employment security; (10) wages; (11) working time; (12) occupational safety and health; (13) social security; (14) maternity protection; (15) social policy; (16) migrant workers; (17) seafarers; (18) fishermen; (19) dockworkers; (20) indigenous and tribal people; (21) specific categories of workers; and (22) final articles conventions.

Concerns regarding labor issues at the international level, especially in exporting countries, have generally two dimensions: humanitarian and economic. At the humanitarian level, the arguments are around the promotion  of universal moral working and living conditions and the search for fairer trade circumstances that include the development  of social, labor, and political provisions. At the economic  level, the arguments  are based on the premise that countries that do not guarantee and enforce at least minimum international labor standards may have an illegitimate competitive advantage in their exports and may result in a global “race to the bottom” in labor and social standards.

Historical Background

The relationship among trade, development, and labor standards  has  long  been  interrelated.   Generally,  in more  advanced  countries  labor standards  are policy articulated and legally enforced. The issue of trade and international labor standards  precedes the creation of the ILO in 1919. Indeed, the objective of the ILO was to undertake  shared actions at the international level to improve labor conditions worldwide. This objective is reflected in the preamble to the constitution of the ILO, which begins:

Whereas universal and lasting peace can be established only if it is based upon social justice; and whereas conditions of labour exist involving such injustice, hardship and privation to large numbers of people as to produce  unrest  so great that  the peace and harmony of the world are imperilled…. Whereas  also the failure of any nation  to adopt humane conditions of labour is an obstacle in the way of other nations which desire to improve the conditions in their own countries.

The pioneer of the idea of international labor legislation and the precursor  of the ILO was the French manufacturer  Daniel  Le  Grand   (1783–1859).  Le Grand repeatedly appealed to several European governments for joint legislation on working life and conditions, which are seen as predecessor of the international labor Conventions of the ILO.

Between 1856 and 1857, the private initiative by industrialists  that aimed at the protection of workers known as the International Benevolent Congress adopted  the motion  in favor of collectively drafting international measures  for the regulation  of industrial labor, which together with the labor movement were  the  beginning  of the  internationalization  of labor regulations. In 1889 the Swiss Federal Council called on the support of 13 governments to consider a proposal for a convention  to internationally  regulate working conditions.

Simultaneously the German government organized an international mine and labor conference, known as the Berlin Conference, that took place for two weeks in March 1890. This conference set the recommendations for the prohibition  of child labor, Sunday work, regulation of mine labor, women, and young persons’ labor. Although no international assurances were formalized, this Berlin Conference was the first time that multilateral recommendations were discussed collectively by governments regarding labor issues.

In  August  1897 delegates  from  14 countries  sat together in Zurich in the first International Congress of Labour Protection, and passed among others a resolution for the creation of an international labor office. Between 1897 and 1919, other meetings with similar objectives took place in both Europe and America. In 1919 at the Paris Peace Conference, the trade unions demanded  appointment of a tripartite  Commission on International Labour Legislation. The International Labour Organization  was brought  in effect by Part XIII of the Treaty of Versailles, and declared that “universal and lasting peace can be established only if it is based upon social justice.”

The Labour Charter  set in the Treaty of Versailles (1919) consisted of nine principles to guide the policy of member states of the ILO regarding labor issues: (1) labor should not be regarded merely as a commodity or an article of commerce; (2) the right of association; (3) the payment  of an adequate  wage to maintain  a reasonable standard of living; (4) an eight-hour day or a 48-hour week; (5) a weekly rest of at least 24 hours; (6) the abolition of child labor; (7) equal pay for equal work; (8) equitable economic treatment of all workers in country; and (9) an inspection system to ensure the enforcement  of the laws for workers’ protection.

These nine principles were extended in the Declaration of Philadelphia in 1944, giving particular emphasis to (1) labor is not a commodity; (2) freedom of expression and association are essential to sustained progress; (3) poverty anywhere constitutes  a danger to prosperity everywhere; and (4) the war against want must be carried on with unrelenting  vigor within each nation, and by continuous  and concerted  international effort in which the representatives  of workers and employers, enjoying equal status with those governments, join with them in free discussion and democratic decisions with a view to the promotion of the common welfare.

The  Declaration  of Philadelphia  asserts  what  is central  criteria  for national  and  international policies and measures: “all human  beings irrespective of race, creed or sex, have the right to pursue both their material well-being and their spiritual development in condition  of freedom and dignity, of economic security and equal opportunity.”

Internationalization Of Labor Standards

International organizations,  such as the ILO and the OECD,  have  a  critical  role  in  setting  international labor standards through social clauses in trade-related agreements. The inclusion of labor standards elements in trade agreements  such as the European Union and the United States Generalized Systems of Preferences (GSP) are examples of initiatives at the bilateral level. Moreover,  labor  standards  can also be addressed  at the regional level through provisions such as the adoption of the “EU Charter  of Fundamental  Rights” and the labor “side agreement” of the North American Free Trade Agreement  (NAFTA). At the multilateral  level, examples  of initiatives  include  the  linking of World Trade Organization (WTO) membership to ILO membership. In this case, a country  trading  with another with better  labor protections  is required  to meet the standards of its trading partner. Violators of this principle are subject to WTO sanctions.

Some authors agree that social clauses involving labor issues are best addressed in regional trade agreements such as NAFTA, the European Union, and Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) rather than multilateral trade agreements due to the current limited influence of labor on multilateral organizations such as the WTO.

Skeptical views on labor standards as mechanisms to ensure quality of economic growth argue that the moral and humanitarian arguments behind the introduction of nontrade issues into trade agendas is a form of national protectionism and labor exploitation. The view is built on the argument that international labor standards  prevent  competition   from  imports  from low-wage economies. Another argument, which rests credibility in the International Labour Standards approach,  is that they rely on principles rather  than rights,  and  therefore  implementation and  enforcement depend on voluntarism,  consequently  they are unaccountable and  unstructured. In order  to  overcome this, there are suggestions for anchoring  these principles on follow-up and monitoring  mechanisms committed  to both improve workers conditions  and ensure legitimate competitiveness.

Bibliography:   

  1. Denis Arnold  and  Norman  E. Bowie, “Respect  for  Workers  in  Global  Supply Chains: Advancing the Debate Over Sweatshops,” Business Ethics Quarterly (v.17/1, 2007);
  2. Nancy H. Chau and Ravi Kanbur, “The Race to the Bottom, from the Bottom,” Economica (v.73/290, 2006);
  3. Vivek H. Dehejia and Yiagadeesen Samy, “Trade and Labour Standards: Theory and New Empirical Evidence,” Journal of International Trade & Economic Development (v.13/2, 2004);
  4. Joshua C. Hall and Peter T. Leeson, “Good for the Goose, Bad for the Gander: International Labor Standards and Comparative Development,” Journal of Labor Research (v.28/4, 2007);
  5. Bruce E. Kaufman, The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations: Events, Ideas and the IIRA (International Labour Office, 2004);
  6. Thomas I. Palley, “The Economic Case for International Labour Standards,” Cambridge Journal of Economics (v.28/1, 2004);
  7. Piya Pangsapa and Mark J. Smith, Responsible Politics: Bringing Together Labor Standards, Environment,  and Human  Rights in the Global Corporate Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008);
  8. Werner Sengenberger, Globalization and Social Progress: The Role and Impact of International Labour Standards (Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2005);
  9. Xiaomin Yu, “Impacts of Corporate Code of Conduct on Labor Standards: A Case Study of Reebok’s Athletic Footwear Supplier Factory in China,” Journal of Business Ethics (v.81/3, 2008);
  10. Matt Zwolinksi, “Sweatshops, Choice and Exploitation,” Business Ethics Quarterly (v.17/4, 2007).

This example Labor Standards Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

See also:

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER


Always on-time

Plagiarism-Free

100% Confidentiality

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH 24START DISCOUNT CODE