Maastricht Treaty Essay ⋆ Business Essay Examples ⋆ EssayEmpire

The Maastricht Treaty is the supranational agreement that created the European Union (EU) and moved member states closer to economic and political unity. Also known as the Treaty on European Union, it derives its name from the Dutch city Maastricht in which it was signed on February 7, 1992, following a prolonged period of often fractious and politically charged negotiations. After eventually being ratified by all members, the Maastricht Treaty took effect on November 1 of the following year, superseding the Treaty of Rome and the European Economic Community (EEC) and marking the greatest degree of multinational cooperation achieved to date among European member states. The treaty can be regarded as the continuation of a decades-long trend wherein many European nations have been progressively moving toward economic and political unity.

At the time the Maastricht Treaty brought the EU into existence, it contained 12 original member countries, with Austria, Finland, and Sweden later joining as additional signatories in 1995. In 2004 and again in 2007, the treaty was amended to permit the inclusion of 12 additional states (10 in 2004, two in 2007) into the EU. Presently three countries are candidates for EU membership, and the treaty is expected to be expanded again with the anticipated accession of Croatia, Macedonia, and Turkey into the EU, although as of 2008 no admission date had been agreed upon. However, in the wake of the rapid expansion of the EU in the first years of the 21st century, many citizens of current member states advocate a slower rate of expansion.

Subsequent external protocols associated with the Maastricht Treaty facilitated the adoption of new policies related to political and economic unity, including the establishment of EU citizenship, giving citizens of states holding full EU membership the right to live and work in any EU state and the right to vote in elections in that state. Many aspects of EU law and the Maastricht Treaty regulate matters unrelated to trade or economic affairs, such as television broadcast standards, exhaust regulations for automobiles, public health guidelines, and the elimination of capital punishment.

While many dimensions of the Maastricht Treaty also address social and political issues, arguably its primary function is to strengthen its members economically. Specifically, cultivation of closer economic linkages between member states improves the ability of the community as a whole to compete in the arena of global trade. By eliminating or reducing tariffs and by simplifying the movement of goods and labor across borders, the community as a whole was foreseen as becoming more economically efficient and competitive. The Maastricht Treaty delineated policies and distinct phases of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) that eventually led to the introduction of the euro in 1999 and established it as the common currency of most EU member states. The treaty also established the economic criteria that EU states must fulfill as members.

Additionally, the treaty created a body of institutions that have become collectively known as the “Three Pillars of the EU”: the European Communities (EC) pillar that had existed in previous form within the European Community (EC) organization, the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) pillar, and the Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters (PJCC) pillar. The first pillar, or EC Pillar, is concerned principally with economic, environmental, and social policies and addresses matters such as agriculture, customs, economic/monetary union, healthcare, and immigration and citizenship policies. The second, or CFSP Pillar, addresses foreign policy and military matters such as deployment of peacekeepers. The third, or PJCC Pillar, promotes cooperation in combating smuggling, terrorism, and other forms of crime. The pillar structure of organizing laws and regulations is slated to be abolished by merging into a single, consolidated European Union authority in 2009 pending the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon.

Support for the Maastricht Treaty has not been universal, and its ratification was contested heavily in several nations including Britain, Denmark, and France. Elements within both the British government and the general public were opposed to certain social provisions proposed by Maastricht, and Britain was initially granted exemptions from the social chapter of the treaty such as those regulating workers’ pay and benefits. After a change in government, Britain eventually did adopt Maastricht’s social protocols, but together with Denmark and Sweden has declined to adopt the euro as its currency. After initially voting against the treaty by a narrow margin, Danish voters later narrowly voted to ratify Maastricht after Denmark was permitted to opt out of certain of the treaty’s sociopolitical provisions. Maastricht was only narrowly approved by French voters in a 1993 referendum. More recently, in 2005, Maastricht’s constitution was to be ratified, facilitating a greater merging of sovereignty among members, but opposition was voiced in many countries and voters in both France and the Netherlands rejected the EU constitution via referendum.

Bibliography:

Stefania Baroncelli, Carlo Spagnolo, and Leila Simona Talani, Back to Maastricht: Obstacles to Constitutional Reform Within the EU Treaty (1991–2007) (Cambridge Scholars, 2008);
Michael J. Baun, An Imperfect Union: The Maastricht Treaty and the New Politics of European Integration (Westview Press, 1996);
Elizabeth E. Bomberg and Alexander -G. Stubb, The European Union: How Does it Work? (Oxford University Press, 2003);
European Union, The Treaty of the European Union, Mastricht Treaty, February 7, 1992, eurotreaties.com (cited March 2009);
Paul Hoebink, The Treaty of Maastrict and Europe’s Development Co-operation (Aksant Academic Publishers, 2004);
Berthold Rittberger, Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation-State (Oxford University Press, 2005);
James D. Savage, Making the EMU: The Politics of Budgetary Surveillance and the Enforcement of Maastricht (Oxford University Press, 2007);
Constantin Stefanou, The Dynamic of the Maastricht Process (Bruylant, 2007).

This example Maastricht Treaty Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.