Make-Or-Buy Decision Essay

Cheap Custom Writing Service

The term  make-or-buy  decision represents  the decision  of firms to  organize  their  goods  and  services internally  or  externally.  This decision  is so central to the functioning  of businesses that it has attracted scholars from multiple disciplines such as supply chains, vertical integration, technology, flexibility, allocation of resources,  large versus small organization, and core competencies,  among others. Further, factors that  have been documented as being central to the make-or-buy decision include total acquisition cost,  complexity  of the  product,  technological  factors, costs, and skills. Others  have discussed factors that   include  environment  characteristics,   lifetime costs, and opportunity costs. Although these factors are important, what is missing is the role of market orientation and production costs in the make-or-buy decision-making process.

Given that  market  orientation leads to  superior performance,  and that  production costs depend  on the costs of transportation, which in turn depend on the cost of fuel, it is imperative that managers understand  the  circumstances  under  which  a making  or buying decision is most desirable.

The Make-Or-Buy  Model

Market  orientation refers  to  the  extent  to  which a firm is able to meet  customers’ needs. John Narver and Stanley Slater (1990) view market orientation as a combination  of three behavioral components—customer orientation,  competitor orientation,  and interfunctional  coordination—whereas Ajay Kohli and Bernard Jaworski’s (1990) view of market orientation relates to information  generation, dissemination, and responsiveness relating to customers. Clearly, the fundamental  benefit of being market  oriented  is the creation  of superior  customer  value and continuous superior performance for the business. Empirical research supports this assertion. However, market orientation is the function of costs; e.g., if a product is expensive, customers  may be unwilling to buy, and thus a lack of market orientation on the part of firms.

Further,  the significant increase in the geographical scale of production and  distribution  has necessitated that firms compare production costs. For the purpose of this study, production costs is defined as the total  costs incurred  by a firm through  the purchase of input  goods, its transportation to a plant, and its production.  Prior research addresses the elements of time in transportation, such as order time, timing, punctuality, and frequency, and evaluates the differences between adjacent trading partners, nearby trading partners,  and distant trading partners.  However, there is little reference to the heart of the transportation  costs, such as the cost of fuel. Clearly, an alternative  to geographical proximity  is that  suppliers that are located far from plants should coordinate their transportation systems, leading to considerable reduction  in transportation time and costs. Or, firms should make the product in-house, leading to savings in transportation time and costs.

Research indicates that a “make” decision is desirable when strong  competition  exists between  firms and their vulnerable core competencies.  By contrast, a “buy” decision allows firms to respond  flexibly to changes that  can occur in technology, demand,  and costs, and hence avoid inefficiencies. This makes the argument  for the need for inclusion of market orientation and costs in the make-or-buy decision-making model in order to create superior value for customers and superior performance  for businesses.

The model  suggests that  although  a firm’s decision  to  make  gives rise  to  market  orientation,  its initial cost  of production increases  up  to  a point, beyond  which  the  production cost  decreases,  and thus enables a firm to be more cost competitive and market oriented. By contrast, a firm’s decision to buy has a constant cost. While one scenario may suggest that  the production cost exceeds the benefit being market  orientation,  another  scenario  suggests that the benefit of market orientation outweighs the cost of production.  A third  scenario indicates that  buying is more  desirable than  making because buying is always cheaper than making. Clearly, the first scenario  is desirable  for managers  engaged in service industries, whereas the second scenario is applicable to manufacturing.  The third scenario is advisable for managers who need to maintain a stable market orientation  and thus  keep production cost low; however, firms that  are equipped  to handle  only stable markets  will not  be effective because real markets are often complex and unpredictable.

Although the model depicts how costs can be minimized, sometimes volatile changes in the price of fuel should be factored into the production costs. Indeed, rising fuel costs have been identified as an emergency that affects all supply managers. In sum, the implication for managers  is that  they should recognize the need  for preserving  market  orientation by keeping costs low through the make-or-buy decision.

Bibliography: 

  1. Balram Avittathur and Paul Swamidass, “Matching Plant  Flexibility and  Supplier  Flexibility: Lessons From Small Suppliers of U.S. Manufacturing Plants in India,” Journal of Operations Management  (v.25/3, 2007);
  2. Bernard Jaworski and  Ajay Kohli, “Market  Orientation: Antecedents  and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing (v.57/July, 1993);
  3. Ajay Kohli and Bernard Jaworski, “Market Orientation:  The Construct,  Research  Propositions,  and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing (v.54, 1990);
  4. Socrates Moschuris “Triggering Mechanisms  in Make-orBuy Decisions: An Empirical Analysis,” The Journal of Supply Chain  Management  (v.43/1, 2007);
  5. John Narver  and Stanley Slater, “The Effects of a Market  Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing (v.54/4, 1990);
  6. Nada Sanders,  “Pattern  of Information  Technology  Use: The Impact  on Buyer-Supplier Coordination and Performance,” Journal of Operations Management  (v.26/3, 2008);
  7. Stanley Slater and John Narver, “Does Competitive  Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?” Journal of Marketing (v.58/1, 1994).

This example Make-Or-Buy Decision Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

See also:

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER


Always on-time

Plagiarism-Free

100% Confidentiality

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH 24START DISCOUNT CODE