Matrix Structure Essay

Cheap Custom Writing Service

The matrix  structure  is one of the most  prominent organizational  structures  used by multinational corporations   (MNCs).  Made  up  by  the  combination of some elementary organizational structures,  the matrix  structure  is meant  to cope with the increasing internal and external complexity MNCs face as a result of their growing internationalization and diversification. While up until the 1970s the matrix structure was embraced as a kind of best practice to organize large, multidivisional MNCs, the following years have seen  some  disenchantment, due  to  the  many difficulties MNCs faced in designing and managing matrix  structures.  Nevertheless,  many large MNCs nowadays still adopt a matrix structure.

The matrix  structure  is one of three  basic structural  models MNCs have at hand  to cope with the problems  that  arise from the geographic  dispersion of their  business activities. If internationalization is still rather  piecemeal, MNCs often opt for an international division structure  in which all foreign business activities are taken together  and managed separate from the domestic  business. In a later stage of their  internationalization many  MNCs  turn  to  elementary forms of global structures,  i.e., to the global functional, the global geographical, or the global product  structure.  These elementary  forms of global structures  integrate  national  and international business activities according to one organizing principle. For instance, in a global product  structure,  business activities are organized in different product  divisions that have worldwide responsibility. Elementary forms of global structures  overcome some problems associated with the international division structure  such as resource  duplication  or slow knowledge flow. However, they are not sufficiently responsive to the multiple and sometimes conflicting demands that strongly internationalized MNCs face. This is what the matrix structure  is meant for. The matrix structure  is a gridlike combination  of two  elementary  organizational structures,  which  have equal  priority.  This implies two lines of command and reporting. For instance, in a matrix  combining  global product  and global geographical structures,  a foreign subsidiary reports  to the  headquarters simultaneously  through  a specific product division and a specific regional organization.

MNCs from many industries have adopted matrix structures, including aerospace, automotive, chemical, and banking. Three conditions seem to be instructive for a particular MNC to choose a matrix structure: (1) there are outside pressures for the equal recognition of two foci (e.g., product  and region); (2) a high level of information-processing capability is needed to stay competitive;  and  (3) there  is strong  need  to  share resources  (e.g., technologies  or  human   resources) within the MNC. In such situations  a matrix  structure  promises  significant advantages. It allows for a mutual   recognition   of  the  different  requirements global and local customers have. It facilitates access to resources, skills, and technologies  across incumbent functional, geographic, or product-related divides. It supports  economies of scale and increases information flow through  the introduction and use of lateral communication channels.

However, these advantages are not easy to achieve, leading to a certain  disenchantment and decline in the use of matrix structures  by MNCs from the 1980s onward. For one, problems occurred in designing matrix structures.  Matrix structures  can take rather different shapes and depth.  With  only limited practical experience and theoretical  understanding available, many MNCs found it rather difficult to design a matrix  that  represents  a differentiated  fit with their specific environment and  strategy.  Moreover,  business goals and objectives turned  out as rather  difficult to align in the matrix. Many problems occurred with regard  to managing  the matrix  structure;  thus it turned  out  that  keeping  the  two  reporting  lines equal in importance  is difficult to achieve. This often resulted in strong political conflicts between the reporting  lines. Moreover,  roles and responsibilities in a matrix tended to be unclear and prone to misunderstandings.  Overall, the speed of decision making slowed down.

There are two key remedies proposed to overcome these problems and to make the matrix a more successful and forward-looking organizational  structure (again). First,  more  in-depth  research  needs  to  be conducted  to better  understand the functioning  and applicability of different  types of matrix  structures. Second, the design and application of an appropriate matrix  structure  needs to be accompanied  by measures that develop the abilities and behaviors of individual managers in order to successfully perform in a matrix structure.  These measures include the development and communication of a consistent corporate vision, some training  to broaden  the individual perspectives, as well as the co-optation of managers  in project teams that cross reporting lines.

Bibliography:   

  1. Christopher A. Bartlett and Sumantra Ghoshal, “Matrix Management: Not a Structure, a Frame of Mind,”  Harvard  Business Review (v.68/4, 1990);
  2. Stanley Davis and Paul R. Lawrence, Matrix (Addison-Wesley, 1977);
  3. Jay R. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley, 1973);
  4. Jay  Galbraith,  Designing the Global Corporation (Jossey-Bass, 2000);
  5. Nitin Nohria and Sumantra  Ghoshal, The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation (JosseyBass, 1997);
  6. Robert A. Pitts and John D. Daniels, “Aftermath of the Matrix Mania,” Columbia Journal of World Business (v.19/2, 1984);
  7. John M. Stopford  and  Louis T. Wells, Jr., Managing  the Multinational Enterprise:  Organization  of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiaries (Basic Books, 1972);
  8. Thomas Sy and Stéphane  Côté, “Emotional Intelligence: A Key Ability to Succeed in the Matrix Organization,” Journal of Management  Development (v.23/5, 2004);
  9. Joachim Wolf and William G. Egelhoff, “A Reexamination and Extension of International Strategy-Structure Theory,” Strategic Management Journal (v.23/2, 2002).

This example Matrix Structure Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

See also:

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER


Always on-time

Plagiarism-Free

100% Confidentiality

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH 24START DISCOUNT CODE