Managing the demands of both work and personal life has become an important challenge facing most people today, and there has emerged a growing focus on workplace policies geared toward enhanced work/ personal life balance. During the span of the past quarter to half century, rapid change in the composition of the family unit, the nature of work, and the function of the worker have together made the concept of work/personal life balance increasingly popular. Yet, settling on a universal or decided definition of work/personal life balance has proven to be an elusive goal of researchers, managers, and employees. This is because the term balance does not necessarily indicate that equal amounts of time and effort are dedicated to the demands of both areas of responsibility. Defining what effectively constitutes work/personal life balance has nevertheless become the source of much inquiry throughout the workplace and among the workforce.
One reason for this relatively recent phenomenon is that work life and personal life had been historically treated as independent areas of study. Plenty of social science, business, and related literature regarded work and personal life, or “home life,” as two separate domains in which an individual could function productively in one domain without undue influence from or on the other domain. But by the mid-to-late 20th century, this concept was increasingly eroded by theories that argued for a link between thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in people’s work and personal lives.
Although there exist various models of work/personal life balance, they generally accept that work has an impact on home life and vice versa. Among one strand of assumptions is that what occurs in one domain can positively or negatively influence—or “spill over” to—the experiences, behaviors, and attitudes in the other domain. A similar, though separate, set of research proposes that any needs, experiences, pleasures, and the like that lack in one domain could be compensated for in the other domain. An additional model advocates that one domain is a means by which to facilitate or obtain effects in the other domain. This model finds its philosophical underpinnings in the works of John Dewey, Émile Durkheim, and Robert Merton, who largely claimed that a certain environment or things within an environment can be used as tools to achieve an outcome or solve a problem in another environment. For instance, work could serve as a means to achieving a certain standard of living or quality of life. Examples aside, yet another model views work/personal life balance as a “conflict.” This suggests that the norms of both highly demanding domains are incompatible to a point that the individual must make sacrifices in one domain to satisfy requirements in the other domain.
While such models of work/personal life balance differ to some extent, they each seek to provide an understanding of the relationships and causes and responses that result in whatever balance between the work and home-life domains. But where research to support these propositions exists, the efforts to confirm or refute such models have not yielded consistent results because application of each model is rather contingent on the range of individual and situational factors within the numberless workplaces. So it is that another branch of literature, which has examined the boundaries between work and personal life, could contribute to a better understanding of work/ personal life balance. The frameworks from this body of knowledge convey the substance of the many roles that an individual is likely to juggle between work and personal life.
Today, many individuals conceive the border between work and personal life across a personally established continuum. Some people choose to allocate most of their time and effort to work whereas others focus more on personal life; a good many seek to invest highly in both roles. Different workplaces have their own sets of cultures, patterns, and processes, which means they each give varying degrees of purpose and respect to the employee. For example, one workplace may reward long hours and self-neglect, while the values of its competitor may be diametrically opposed; such dimensions could well be the case even among departments in the same organization. Yet, even in places where the demands of work-related tasks and responsibilities are clear, formal lines between work and personal life remain ambiguous. For instance, when does commuting time to and from work fall under the work domain versus the personal life domain? When does reading a newspaper constitute a work or personal life activity? When does volunteer work in the local community correspond to one’s work rather than personal life pursuits?
The growing confusion over the work/personal life relationship has been attributed to a number of social transformations, including a marked increase in the number of dual-earning families and an increase in the number of single-parent households. Much of contemporary society has in numerous ways shied away from the traditional family life in which males gave precedence to work over home-life demands, leaving the female partner to tend to home-life demands and to adapt any career pursuits accordingly. Such relatively new social factors have had a permeable and significant impact on the global workforce, and have led to an upheaval in the establishment and management of work/personal life boundaries.
That there tends to be an effective incompatibility between the frequency, intensity, and time commitment across people’s work and personal life roles means achieving a precise definition of work/personal life balance is a stable and complex challenge. Although research and insight into this and similar workforce issues is being consistently developed throughout the world, what is already known underscores the importance of considering individual differences in the context of balancing work and personal life.
Bibliography:
- T. Bond et al., The 2002 National Study of the Changing Workforce (Families and Work Institute, 2002);
- E. Champoux, “Perceptions of Work and Nonwork: A Reexamination of the Compensatory and Spillover Models,” Sociology of Work and Occupations (1978);
- James G. Clawson, Balancing Your Life Executive Lessons for Work, Family and Self (World Scientific, 2009);
- F. Drucker, The New Realities (Transaction Publishers, 2003);
- M. Kanter, Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy (Russell Sage Foundation, 1977);
- “Work-Life Balance: Readers Opine on How to Get a Life,” BusinessWeek (v.36, 2008);
- Zedeck and K. Mosier, “Work in the Family and Employing Organization,” American Psychologist (v.45/2, 1990);
- Zemke et al., Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace (American Management Association, 2000).
This example Work/Personal Life Balance Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.