Melting Pot Essay ⋆ Essays on Controversial Topics ⋆ EssayEmpire

The earliest articulation of the melting pot concept came in 1782, from J. Hector St. John Crevecoeur, a French officer turned New York settler, who envisioned assimilated Europeans as ingredients in a vast melting pot of cultures. The concept of the melting pot later expanded to include people from different races and backgrounds, as it became one of the cornerstones of assimilation theory. While many academics dispute the relevance of the term, the model of the melting pot offers an idealistic vision of U.S. society and identity, combining people from diverse ethnic, religious, political, and economic backgrounds together into a single people.

Theoretical Context

Throughout the 19th century, presidents and poets alike echoed the idea of the United States as a unique site for cultural assimilation, as new waves of immigrants sought to put down roots. However, the visual image of foreign assimilation came to the forefront of public culture through Israel Zangwill’s popular play, The Melting Pot of 1908, which venerated the assimilation of European immigrants, even “the black and yellow races,” into a universal American culture. Once established, the icon of the melting pot served to legitimize American ideologies of equal opportunity and independence from European nations, as immigrants could recast themselves as Americans by learning English and adapting to American norms.

Early theoretical grounding for the melting pot took root in the Chicago School assimilation theory of the 1910s. Here, human ecologist Robert Park outlined a “race relations cycle” in which new immigrant groups adopted an accommodating stance to the host culture, copying outward customs and norms to allow successful economic interaction. Park and others expressed belief that, over generations, these cultural compromises gradually led to conformity of language, opinion, and belief.

Even contemporary accounts of assimilation theory interpret the idea of the melting pot as a precursor to the assimilationist idea of immigrant incorporation: a complex and multidimensional yet mostly “straight line” adaptation of immigrants into U.S. society. In his classic 1964 account of assimilation theory, Milton Gordon not only observed seven different stages of assimilation—that is, cultural, structural, identity, and so on—but he also reinforced the idea of a “triple melting pot” (Catholic, Jewish, Protestant) originally put forward by Ruby Jo Kennedy in her intermarriage study of New Haven in 1944. Gordon said that immigrants with common Protestant roots followed a direct path of adaptation into the Anglo-Saxon, Protestant core of U.S. society, and Catholics and Jews into their own homogenizations, thus associating the melting pot with a nexus of religious values toward which all others eventually integrated. Gordon further argued that racial discrimination prevented blacks, Asians, Mexican Americans, and some Puerto Ricans from participating meaningfully in either the white Protestant or white Catholic communities. His comments made it clear that structural societal conditions prevented the existence of one homogeneous melting pot; rather there were multiple melting pots, and some groups did not belong to any of them.

Contesting the Term

Gordon’s contemporaries Nathan Glazer and Daniel P. Moynihan further demonstrated the problematic aspects of the melting pot idea in their seminal work Beyond the Melting Pot of 1963. They showed that ethnic backgrounds and identities can provide resistance to “melting” and are quite central in structuring the immigrant incorporations. In a later 1970 edition, the authors acknowledge that not only ethnicity plays a role in structuring life and conflict in the city, but economic interests and racism are of equal significance in understanding social patterns.

The essence of Glazer and Moynihan’s argument is probably best summarized by their sentence: “The point about the melting pot is that it did not happen.” Four decades after the book’s publication, most scholarly evidence seems to support this conclusion. Scholars show that descendants of immigrants in major U.S. cities neither fully melted nor replicated the culture of the previous generation. Instead, they adopted selected elements of U.S. society while celebrating their own particularities and cultural roots, becoming Americans in their own way.

The significance of race remains a salient factor working against the image of U.S. society as a melting pot. For many immigrants, adaptation continues to be obstructed by racism, through such forms of inequalities as housing segregation and unequal access to economic opportunity and education. A more popular metaphor than melting pot is calling modern America a “salad bowl,” in which separate racial and ethnic groups interact without fully assimilating.

While the imagery of the melting pot has held powerful sway over public and academic interest for nearly a century, critical examination of immigrant populations casts doubt on its value as a theoretical concept. New research has opened up avenues exploring the enduring structures of immigrant groups, including ethnic enclaves, immigrant niches, and ethnic economies. At present, the adoption of revised perspectives such as multiculturalism and “new assimilation theory” increasingly proves the melting pot concept of limited use.

Bibliography:

Alba, Richard and Victor Nee. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, Elijah. 2000. “Beyond the Melting Pot Reconsidered.” International Migration Review 34(1):262-70.
Glazer, Nathan and Daniel P. Moynihan. 1963. Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gordon, Milton M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origin. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kasinetz, Philip. 2000. “Beyond the Melting Pot: The Contemporary Relevance of a Classic?” International Migration Review 34(1):248-55.
Parrillo, Vincent N. 1994. “Diversity in America: A Sociohistorical Analysis.” Sociological Forum 9(4):523-i5.
Portes, Alejandro. 2000. “An Enduring Vision: The Melting Pot That Did Happen.” International Migration Review 34(1):243-48.

This example Melting Pot Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. EssayEmpire.com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.