Category: Political Science Essay Examples
See our collection of political science essay examples. These example essays are to help you understanding how to write a political science essay. Political science is not merely an academic discipline, and political scientists do not just study the anatomy of politics. Political science is renewed with every political administration and with every major political event and with every political leader. Influential political leaders construct their own -isms (Fidelism/Castroism, Maoism, Gandhism, Reaganism, and so on) so that the political philosophies and ideologies that undergird the discipline have to be reinvented constantly. Also, see our list of political science essay topics to find the one that interests you.
The ways in which the Jewish people have thought and written about politics, divine authority and human power, and the dispensing of justice have been shaped by their unique historical experience. Over the course of two and a half thousand years, Jews have lived under a remarkable variety …
Literally jihad means “effort” and in Islamic tradition it has been interpreted as “striving for God.” According to the Quran and hadiths (narratives of sayings and doings of Prophet Muhammad), jihad is a duty that may be achieved in four main ways: by the heart, the tongue, the …
Laws pertaining to the separation of races in the American South were referred to as Jim Crow laws. The term Jim Crow can be traced to the early nineteenth century. Jim Crow was the name of a character in a popular minstrel play performed in the United States …
Political journalism reports about domestic politics and institutions. It can include political analysis, opinion, interpretation, and advocacy. From the middle of the first half of the nineteenth century, American newspapers’ partisanship and reliance on opinion were the norm. The papers were numerous, slim, and financed by political parties. …
In philosophical terms, judgment is the intellectual process of subsuming particulars under, or otherwise connecting them to, universals. Thus, this particular thing is a cat, that particular thing is a chair, and so on. Ordinarily, we have widely accepted rules, formulas, or tests for making such judgments reliably. …
Judgments refer to external evaluations of the world, regarding the probability, likelihood, or frequency of events occurring. Judgments often happen under conditions of uncertainty. Decisions involve internal trade-offs of values and often take place under conditions of risk. Judgments can be systematically and predictably influenced by heuristics, which …
Judicial activism is too often simply a criticism made against a judge who exercises the power of judicial review to strike down a democratically enacted law on constitutional grounds. If judicial activism is only a way to disagree with a judge’s decision, it has little jurisprudential value. Judicial …
Judicial behavior is a field of inquiry in political science that seeks to understand and explain actions taken by judges and courts. At the foundation of this scholarly endeavor are systematic efforts to build generalizable theories, empirically tested, that illuminate and clarify the primary factors that drive judicial …
Judicial independence in modern society and in the classical liberal tradition is considered to be one of the cornerstones of any free and democratic society. But what is meant by judicial independence? Considering the concept of the term independence, the first definition that comes to mind usually involves …
Judicial philosophy is the set of ideas that inform how justices and judges rule in cases. Judicial philosophies can be based on many different elements. They may be based on theories of constitutional inter pretation, views about the place of courts in a democratic republic, or notions about …
Judicial restraint is too often simply an endorsement of a judge who upholds a democratically enacted law on constitutional grounds. If the term is only a way to agree with a judge’s decision, it has little jurisprudential value. After all, the role of a judge in the system …
Judicial review is the capacity of a court to review and, if necessary, reject the laws or directives of the legislative or executive branch. In administrative law, judicial review simply refers to court oversight of government actions, and in this usage, judicial review is a necessary component of …
Courts play an important role in most Western democracies and varying roles elsewhere in the world. Understanding judicial selection offers a window on how justice is dispensed, which is a reflection of how politics and the political system of a given country work. At the outset, it must …
Broadly speaking, judicial supremacy is the position that courts have supreme or final power to interpret a nation’s constitution or supreme law. A person who subscribes to judicial supremacy supports the rulings of judges even despite any belief that such rulings are based on incorrect or flawed interpretations …
The fundamental purpose for judicial systems or the court systems is to provide an institutional mechanism for the resolution of disputes. While the specific characteristics of judicial institutions vary across countries, they all operate to ensure that a neutral party (i.e., the individual judge or group of judges) …
The judiciary refers to the courts or institutions that administer the law on behalf of the state or the sovereign. It also refers collectively to the judges, magistrates, and other personnel who function in courts and resolve disputes under law or legal principles. The judiciary’s role in government …
Jurisprudence is the study of law in its broadest forms. Historically, jurisprudence has been concerned with the answer of two questions—one descriptive, one normative: What is law and what is justice (or to what ends should law be put)? Answers to these questions in different times and different …
The concepts of justice and injustice have been deployed for about two and a half millennia to evaluate human beings, human actions, and the consequences—discrete and aggregate—of human actions. Although the concept of justice has been developed into numerous and often conflicting conceptions, its applications have evolved considerably. …
Just war theory is a body of principles developed over centuries that attempt to delineate what justifies the initiation of armed conflict and what rules govern the subsequent conduct of fighting. The contemporary dominant strand of the concept developed from the Western, Judeo-Christian canon, but non-Western philosophies, including …
Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) was a German philosopher and a thinker of the very highest rank. He is considered by many to be the most important philosopher of the modern age. In his so-called first critique, The Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and 1787), Kant sought to describe the …
